Technocracy would utilize specialists in the field to solve problems on a public scale.
Presumably it assumes that technology can resolve many complex economic,scientific problems but some issues have multiple effects on ethics,moral,environment,humanism.Some problems have effects that would be apparent only after a long time.
Quality of life would be better if the population growth is manageable based on the resources available to sustain a decent life.Unfortunately ,since reproduction is a human right,then how would governments deal with balancing population growth with economic growth?
A parliamentary system has elected representatives based on geographic locality .How about one that is based on diverse age groups,ethnic groups,occupational representation with workers and employers each having equal representation?
Despite all that rhetoric ,at the end of the day the real power behind the throne is still money talks.
If technology replaces human labour,then who would be the consumers of goods and services produced by technological advancement? What would be the consequence on society if human labour is redundant? Work adds meaning and purposeto life and if one doesn't,then why are humans here on earth?
No comments:
Post a Comment